The Supreme Court, hearing so far, have been mix bags for both sides!
Thank you for reading this post, don't forget to subscribe!on one side, it’s kinda obvious that the court don’t want to dismiss the case against Donald Trump straight off; as he sorta pushes the justices to do this, basing on his big theory of presidential immunity,
On an another side! many justices seem skeptics about how the special counsel is shaping the case?
It could happen that, a decision might be made that could need several months, more of them in the lower courts before the case against Trump can actually goes on trial, This could means that a pre-election trial might totally be unreachable! Making a chance that Trump getting reelected, and horror! this could makes the case against him to just vanish.
Kavanaugh is wondering if a “creative prosecutor” maybe could go after other ex-presidents with same charges Trump has now. “The problem here it’s the not-so-clear law,” Kavanaugh believes, noting the obstruction and conspiracy to defraud charges directed at Trump in this scenario,
those charges? Kavanaugh reminds us. “Can be swung at lots of stuff presidents did, in history, by a real creative prosecutor who wants to pick on a president!”
Donald Trump in his mighty claim of melting immunity from criminal charges—it’s sorta new, but it’s not appearing from nowhere. He’s sorta leaning partly on a 1982 court decision, where it was Found that Ex-placeholders of the prez office get a shield from civil cases due to their actions while in the office.
This case—which has been popping up occasionally Discussing Today! Including one time by Chief Justice, John Roberts.
Nixon vs. Fitzgerald. it was about an old Air Force guy, uh, A. Ernest Fitzgerald, who got canned after he Blabbed in Congress about some real mess-ups making the C-5A transport plane, and decided to sue Nixon. The judges? by a 5-4 vote, decided former presidents indeed have this special immunity, ’Cause of the “Unique office” they held.
