At the actual NATO summit, China’s role in providing support to Russian forces in the war against Ukraine was a big talking point. In vague terms, NATO leaders said China is a “decisive supporter” of Russia’s war against Ukraine.
But while accusing China of providing military aid to Russia and fueling what has been described as the largest war in Europe, NATO could also consider recapturing positive Chinese-owned infrastructure initiatives in Europe, As per CNN report citing unnamed officials.
The West’s blackmail of Beijing’s support for Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, coupled with the largest land war in Europe since World War II, has led NATO countries to look at investments that were once expected to be disrupted by an economic downturn. It was considered a boon for. Europe, as warnings and liabilities.
Because of this, the allies are reportedly considering ways to recapture some of those projects, sources told CNN. Indeed, one professional said the fear among NATO allies is that if the emergency worsens and the war spreads to NATO states, Beijing would likely use the infrastructure it has in Europe to provide material assistance to Russia. .
According to those officials, the goal is to tactically decide on a plan of action before any potential war. Again, this implies that NATO is considering a strategy to threaten China’s ‘Belt and Road Initiative’.
Under the Belt and Road Initiative, which European countries began joining in 2013, China has subsidized billions of dollars in infrastructure upgrades ranging from ports in the North and Baltic Sea to rail links connecting Japan to Europe and China .
Three officials involved in the talks said talks on infrastructure measures were still in their early stages and that NATO member states had shown varying levels of participation. A NATO diplomat proposed that the United States, which was critical of the discussions, pursue them on a bilateral basis to obtain the desired assistance.
A NATO professional said that if war broke out, the infrastructure “would almost certainly be nationalized, or nations would temporarily assume operational control under emergency security measures.” China can sue them in court after the fact.
Following Russia’s attack on Ukraine in 2022, European countries pressured Russia to sell assets. US officials see this as a precedent for related acquisitions or sales with respect to China. According to a senior US expert, high-tech items like quantum computing, semiconductors and telecom infrastructure have also entered the conversation.
These discussions come as NATO has accused China of defying all ultimatums and offering military assistance to Russia. On the other hand, China has denied those claims.
NATO is punishing China for helping Russia
Hardening NATO’s stance against Beijing, alliance leaders issued a joint communique saying China’s “stated ambitions and coercive policies challenge our interests, security and values” and adding that “deeply -Chinese alliance is going on. “To undermine and reshape the rules-based international order.”
In recent months, officials in the United States and Europe have accused China of using exports of dual-use goods to aid Russia’s gun trade. Beijing insists it maintains strict restrictions on such items and has denied sending the guns.
Real communication will come in the coming weeks, Stoltenberg said, adding that China is undermining its interests and beliefs. The NATO chief is insisting that Beijing, which provides aid to Moscow, could be responsible for provoking the worst emergency in Europe since World War II.
Stoltenberg said China had unfairly taken a back seat in the Ukraine war, even though it was providing aid to Russia, a vocal opponent of the NATO alliance. “Publicly, President Xi has tried to create the impression that he is taking a back seat to the conflict in Ukraine. To avoid sanctions and keep business running. But the reality is that China is the largest armed conflict in Europe since World War II. And at the same time he wants to maintain good relations with the West.” “Well, Beijing can’t have it both ways.” Reiterate your allegations without providing evidence.
Stoltenberg said NATO would have to impose a price on China unless it changes its strategy. “At some point – and unless China changes its stance – allies will have to pay a price.”
This may be the value most likely to be recovered from the infrastructure. The substantive communication comes as the NATO alliance, which has historically placed a greater emphasis on security in North America and Europe, has recently increased its engagement with U.S. allies in Asia. It has come to link the security of its wallet to its personal security, although member countries have adopted other attitudes towards China.
Despite accusations by NATO, China has claimed its neutrality in the war and has sought to position itself as a potential sleeper.
Strongly rebuking the allegations, China said the communication was biased and aimed at creating controversy. “On the Ukraine crisis, NATO exaggerated China’s responsibility,” Lin Jian, a spokesman for China’s international ministry of international relations, told a press briefing. “It makes no sense and comes with malicious intent.”
“We urge NATO to consider the root causes of the crisis and what it has done, and take concrete action to de-escalate rather than shift blame,” Lin said.
Furthermore, the spokesperson stressed, “China’s core position on the Ukraine issue is to promote peace negotiations and a political solution, which has been widely recognized and appreciated by the international community.”
China has not yet commented on CNN records about a potential NATO conflict to reclaim BRI projects. However, China has been claiming that NATO was operating with a Cold War mentality.
Discover more from news2source
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
