What has NATO promised Ukraine – and was Gaza decided at summit talks? , NATO information

Under the leadership of US President Joe Biden, NATO unveiled a layout of unused commitments to Ukraine at its three-day summit in Washington, DC, which marks the military alliance’s 75th anniversary.

“Despots want to overturn the global order” and “terrorist groups” continue to plan “evil plans,” Biden said on Wednesday, adding that current Russian President Vladimir Putin wants to “wipe Ukraine off the map.”

“But make no mistake, Ukraine can and will stop Putin, especially with our full, collective support,” the USA chief said, as NATO leaders mobilized additional troops and fiscal aid for the war-torn European nation, which Was present on the occasion of Kiev. within the block.

Here’s what Ukraine was given from above, more than two years after Russia declared a full-scale invasion of its tiny neighbor – and parts of the region that NATO chose to forget.

What agreement did NATO make with Ukraine at the top?

• The bloc said it would equip Ukraine with a number of additional strategic air defense systems, including four new Patriot batteries and a SAMP/T defense machine.
• NATO leaders have also pledged at least $43 billion in military aid to Ukraine.
• Coalition members also announced alternative individual and joint steps to promote the security of Ukraine.
• The US, the Netherlands and Denmark announced that the first F-16 fighter aircraft provided by NATO will be in the hands of Ukrainian military pilots this summer. The United States also said it would deploy long-range missiles to Germany in 2026, responding to growing Russian threat concerns to Europe.
• Kyiv has also long competed for a seat in the transatlantic alliance. Current differences between member states persist, with the apex declaration stating that “Ukraine’s future lies in NATO” and that the country is on an “irreversible path to full Euro-Atlantic integration, including NATO membership”.
• On the other hand, NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg stressed that Ukraine would not join directly now, but only if the war with Russia ends.

Is Gaza on top of NATO?

The war in Gaza has been largely ignored by Washington D.C. Has not been placed at the top.

NATO’s 38-point joint talks on Wednesday refused to mention the war, except to say that “conflict, fragility and instability in Africa and the Middle East” directly affect NATO security. Biden and most European leaders also remained silent on Gaza.

However, some leaders discussed.

Analyst and retired Turkish colonel Yusuf Albarda said Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan’s tone on Tuesday reminded Western leaders that NATO values ​​are being trampled in Gaza, values ​​that NATO leaders cited as Russia’s And the violation is being carried out through China.

“Erdogan said clearly in his speech: What happened to your Western values ​​in Gaza?” Albarda instructed Al Jazeera.

“In the eyes of the entire world, a genocide is taking place in Gaza,” he said, adding that NATO has largely ignored it, choosing instead to focus on Ukraine.

Spain also had sharp words for its opposite members within the alliance, and called on the bloc to develop the same “unity and stability” for Gaza as they have demonstrated for Ukraine.

“We cannot be accused of applying double standards that would undermine our support for Ukraine. On the contrary, we demand the same unity and stability for Gaza as we do in response to Russia’s invasion of Ukraine,” Spain’s High Minister Pedro Sanchez told fellow NATO environment chiefs at the Atlantic Council consultation in the Spanish press. Gave instructions accordingly. With property from the workplace of the top minister.

“If we are telling our people that we support Ukraine because we defend international law, then we should do the same for Gaza. If we demand respect for international law in Ukraine, we must demand the same in Gaza,” Sanchez pressed.

Al Jazeera’s Mike Hanna, reporting from the top on Wednesday, said the lack of debate about Gaza has been “conspicuous”, particularly with the United States announcing at the time that it would give Israel 500 pounds (227 kg) Was resuming the shipment of bombs.

Did NATO sign any alternative changes in coverage?

The 32-nation bloc does not appear to have deviated too much from its previous policies at the end of this era, throwing permanent aid behind Ukraine and singling out Russia, China, Iran and North Korea as the biggest blackmailers. Is painting. For international security.

However, some changes have been evident.

China: The coalition stepped up its rhetoric in opposition to China, accusing it of being a “decisive supporter of Russia’s war against Ukraine” through “large-scale support for Russia’s defense industrial base.” The bloc also accused Iran and North Korea of ​​promoting war by providing direct military aid to Russia.

Georgia: Relations between the country and the West have deteriorated over the past few years, with NATO blackmailing in May, as Tbilisi’s controversial undrafted foreign agent law was a step away from Georgia’s ambitions to engage with Europe and join NATO. Since 2008, Georgia has been among the few countries that NATO has said will join the alliance in the future – if they meet a layout of requirements.

On the other hand, in this era at the NATO top, the declaration of the rightful leaders on Georgia’s path against the club within the alliance was quiet, even though it discussed Ukraine, Moldova and Bosnia and Herzegovina – alternative aspirants to the club.

Has the United Kingdom’s unused executive influence affected aid to Ukraine?

The top has been the primary opportunity for newly elected British Prime Minister Keir Starmer to talk about international coverage of his executive as well as bilateral family members with fellow leaders.

On Ukraine, Starmer has pledged that his Labor Party executive will step up assistance to Kyiv over the former Conservative management.

According to Steven Siegel, a schoolteacher at the Center for Russian, East European and Eurasian Studies at the University of Texas at Austin, a Labor executive could deepen these ties with Ukraine on three fronts: the military, finance and the humanitarian world. relations.

“Starmer has had a positive impact on his high-profile visits to Ukraine… He met personally with (Ukrainian President Volodymyr) Zelensky on several occasions. I remember his visits to Irpin and Bucha in February 2023 to see Russian war crimes firsthand; These were the most important,” Seagal told Al Jazeera.

Are Biden’s difficult conditions at home affecting NATO?

Biden’s political struggles, on the other hand, loom large on the bloc’s chances.

Serious questions over Biden’s year and fitness for office were raised locally in recent days, following a debate performance against Republican contender and former President Donald Trump, with the incumbent president appearing lost and effectively out of touch. Looked incapable.

Trump is ahead of Biden in polls conducted in key states ahead of the November elections. He has threatened to pull NATO’s original member and the United States, its largest financier, out of the alliance and is a staunch opponent of additional aid to Ukraine.