Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg sounded off on what he thinks is AI to date in an interview Thursday, saying he deeply believes there can’t be “just one AI.” Citing the cost of supplying observables to get AI tools into the hands of many in the community, Zuckerberg took an ounce of time in condemning anonymous competition efforts, which he considers inferior to observables, he also said That they think they are “creating God”.
“I don’t think AI technology is something that should be hoarded and … any one company should use it to build anything centralized. Zuckerberg mentioned in an untaped YouTube interview with Ken Sutter (@Kallaway) that they are building a single product.
“When people in the tech industry talk about building this ‘one true AI’ I think it’s a huge leap forward,” he said. He said, “It’s almost like they think they’re creating God or something and… it’s just – we’re not.” “I don’t think it works that way.”
“I get why, if you’re in an AI lab… you want to feel like what you’re doing is extremely important, right? …It’s like, ‘We’re building a true thing for the future.’ But I just think, like, realistically, things don’t work that way, right?” Zuckerberg defined. “It’s not like there was an app on people’s phones that people use. There’s no one creator that people want all their content from. There is no business that makes people want to buy everything.”
In the conversation, Zuckerberg said there should be an accumulation of different AIs that are created to reflect other activities in the community. The company also on Thursday announced early evaluation of its AI Studio tool in the US that will allow creators and others to create AI avatars that will be able to access the network through Instagram’s messaging machine. The AIs will be able to answer questions from their fans and interact with the community in an entertaining way, although they will be classified as “AI” for the purpose of indecision.
Regarding companies creating closed AI platforms, the Meta CEO said that they did not consider how you can create the most efficient reports for the community.
“You want to unlock and … free up as many people as possible to try different things,” he maintained. “I mean, that’s the culture, right? It’s not like a group of people are dictating everything for the people.”
His comments feel somewhat like bitter grapes, as they come on the heels of recent reports that Meta had initially asked Apple to integrate its AI into the way it operates in exchange for best practices with OpenAI. Tried to negotiate with but were unsuccessful. According to Bloomberg, Apple decided not to pursue formal discussions with Meta because it did not feel its privacy practices were strong enough.
Without an offer, Meta faces losing access to potentially billions of iPhone users worldwide. Although apparently Meta’s plan B is to create an era that transcends smartphones.
In the interview, Zuckerberg talked about the company’s journey with ray-preventing Meta Impish glasses, for example, announcing that its path will tie in with the work being done on a perfect holographic display once it’s done. On the other hand, the East may have greater attractiveness in the near term, he said.
“I really think you can create a great experience with cameras, microphones, speakers, and the ability to do multimodal AI, even before you have any kind of display on these glasses,” he said. Also, lack of bullishness helps in keeping the prices balanced. For comparison, Meta’s Impish glasses cost around $300, and the Meta Quest Professional costs $1,000.
Zuckerberg said there will be 3 more products before Convergence: display-less Impish glasses, heads-up type flourishes, and full holographic shows. Sooner or later, he mentioned that in lieu of a neural interface connected to his brain, the community would likely put a wristband that picks up signals from the brain talking to his hand. This may help them maintain correspondence with the neural interface by moving their arm slightly. From generation to generation, this will allow the community to create even types.
Zuckerberg cautioned, however, that such input and AI reports will not lead to immediate changes in smartphones. “I don’t think that, in the history of technology, the new platform – it doesn’t usually completely make people stop using the old thing. It’s just that you use it less,” he said.
For example, the community now values smartphones for doing things they used to do on their computers 10 to 15 years ago.
“I think the same thing is going to happen with glasses,” he said. “It’s not that we will stop having phones. The point is that it will stay in your pocket and you will take it out when you actually need to work with it. But more and more, I think people will start saying, ‘Hey, I can take this photo with my glasses on.’ I can ask this question to the AI, or I can send a message to someone – it’s much easier with Glasses,” Zuckerberg said.
“I wouldn’t be surprised if 10 years from now, we’ll probably still have phones, but it’s probably going to be a lot more intentional in use, rather than just reactively reaching for it and grabbing it for any technical thing. To do whatever you want,” he said.
Discover more from news2source
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
